<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To post or not to post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/</link>
	<description>The nebulous ramblings; grammatical &#38; punctuational experiments of a girl born on the fifth of november</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: diddums</title>
		<link>http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2749</link>
		<dc:creator>diddums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2749</guid>
		<description>I think about this sometimes too. I would feel happier if I could get through a week only posting a time or two; I feel guilty when posting every day. It&#039;s worse still when I have the urge (occasionally) to post two or three times a day!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Other times I&#039;m not in a blogging mood at all, and can manage a couple of weeks without saying a word.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It seems to vary. I read about how you can have a chain of posts ready to go out (when you have a lot to say) but you can schedule the posts so that they are spaced out. They will post themselves automatically; meanwhile you don&#039;t have to hold yourself back from writing, or from pressing the &#039;publish&#039; button.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;d prefer to be posting only once every two or three days, but every day just now I seem to have something new to say... so I just get on with it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think about this sometimes too. I would feel happier if I could get through a week only posting a time or two; I feel guilty when posting every day. It&#8217;s worse still when I have the urge (occasionally) to post two or three times a day!</p>
<p>Other times I&#8217;m not in a blogging mood at all, and can manage a couple of weeks without saying a word.</p>
<p>It seems to vary. I read about how you can have a chain of posts ready to go out (when you have a lot to say) but you can schedule the posts so that they are spaced out. They will post themselves automatically; meanwhile you don&#8217;t have to hold yourself back from writing, or from pressing the &#8216;publish&#8217; button.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer to be posting only once every two or three days, but every day just now I seem to have something new to say&#8230; so I just get on with it. <img src='http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Dustin - yes, consistency is more important than quantity. Although, I&#039;m guilty of being a bit erratic LOL I could probably write daily posts for my personal blog because the readers don&#039;t mind filler posts (memes, videos and so on) but I couldn&#039;t do that here, or on my family history blog. The posts for the latter need at least 2 or 3 days research before I even get around to writing. It wouldn&#039;t be possible to speed that up because I need to get all the facts before me to make the post worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin &#8211; yes, consistency is more important than quantity. Although, I&#8217;m guilty of being a bit erratic LOL I could probably write daily posts for my personal blog because the readers don&#8217;t mind filler posts (memes, videos and so on) but I couldn&#8217;t do that here, or on my family history blog. The posts for the latter need at least 2 or 3 days research before I even get around to writing. It wouldn&#8217;t be possible to speed that up because I need to get all the facts before me to make the post worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DustinM</title>
		<link>http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>DustinM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2008/09/to-post-or-not-to-post/#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>I agree with your premise that a blog doesn&#039;t have to post everyday.  I think a blog should post as often as possible, but always with relevant posts.  If you can only do 1 or 2 relevant posts a week, then that&#039;s how often you should post.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, More important than frequency, is consistently.  If you only do 1 post a week, make it on the same day every week.  That way regulars know when to see your latest writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your premise that a blog doesn&#8217;t have to post everyday.  I think a blog should post as often as possible, but always with relevant posts.  If you can only do 1 or 2 relevant posts a week, then that&#8217;s how often you should post.</p>
<p>Also, More important than frequency, is consistently.  If you only do 1 post a week, make it on the same day every week.  That way regulars know when to see your latest writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
